29 March 2020
For the people who are still coming to me and insulting me even after I published the whole book
I said, "Did you read the whole book or not?
He said to me, "I read the splitting of the moon and the difference between a prophet and a messenger, and I was not convinced by your words and did not finish the book.
I am not prepared to argue with anyone who has read parts of the book or excerpts from it and wants to argue with me about some parts of the book and not the whole book
I tell you that the book complements each other and there are many evidences in all chapters of the book that support my opinion and are supported by evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah, so it is not logical for anyone to argue with me on one point of the book without the rest of the book
I used to accept arguments from many of you based on the publication of small excerpts from my book, but now the situation is different, as I have published the entire book, so it makes no sense for someone to argue with me over one chapter of my book or a few parts of it.
In any case, I have published my entire book, including my opinion on it, supported by the Qur'an and Sunnah, so whoever wants to send me one of his comments on the entire book can send it to me.
I am not imposing my opinion on any of you, I presented my opinion and Al-Azhar's response to my book
For the record, Al-Azhar studied my book in its entirety for two months and sent me his notes on the book in its entirety for those who want to read them, I did not hide them from you, but published them and published my response to them
These were his remarks, devoid of any Qur'anic verse to contradict my book
(He cites the Qur'an and Sunnah about the science of the unseen and then proceeds in a gradual and systematic way to emphasise that man must think about his religion in a scientific and modern way, until he has managed to conceptualise the minor and major signs of the resurrection in a scientific and modern way, and tries to interpret these signs in a comical way that takes him out of the correct Islamic conceptualisation of them.
He does not limit himself to this, but in this book he denies a matter that is known from the religion of necessity in the matter of belief. He declares that Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is the Seal of the Prophets, not the Seal of the Messengers, p. 33 ff. He believes that those who deny this are like the ignorant people who denied the prophethood of our master Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and that painful torment awaits those who believe that he is the Seal of the Messengers and cites verses from Surah al-Dukhan from verse 1 to verse 15 as evidence for this. The whole book is dominated by this malicious idea, and he continues to affirm it from the beginning to the end of the book in an explicit manner, believing that he is the author of a new invitation, and that everyone must believe in it, which denies something that is known from the religion of necessity, namely that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the seal of the prophets and messengers).
This is the opinion of Al-Azhar and you have my entire book, so whoever wants to be convinced of Al-Azhar's opinion, let him be convinced and whoever wants to be convinced of my opinion, let him be convinced.
In the end, my opinion does not contradict the Qur'an and Sunnah, so whoever wants to argue with me, let him come up with a verse or an honourable hadith that denies what I came up with in my book, otherwise he should not trouble himself with me, as I presented my opinion and supported it with the Qur'an and Sunnah, and whoever wants to come up with an opinion that contradicts my opinion, let him come like me with an opinion supported by the Qur'an and Sunnah.
I said, "Did you read the whole book or not?
He said to me, "I read the splitting of the moon and the difference between a prophet and a messenger, and I was not convinced by your words and did not finish the book.
I am not prepared to argue with anyone who has read parts of the book or excerpts from it and wants to argue with me about some parts of the book and not the whole book
I tell you that the book complements each other and there are many evidences in all chapters of the book that support my opinion and are supported by evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah, so it is not logical for anyone to argue with me on one point of the book without the rest of the book
I used to accept arguments from many of you based on the publication of small excerpts from my book, but now the situation is different, as I have published the entire book, so it makes no sense for someone to argue with me over one chapter of my book or a few parts of it.
In any case, I have published my entire book, including my opinion on it, supported by the Qur'an and Sunnah, so whoever wants to send me one of his comments on the entire book can send it to me.
I am not imposing my opinion on any of you, I presented my opinion and Al-Azhar's response to my book
For the record, Al-Azhar studied my book in its entirety for two months and sent me his notes on the book in its entirety for those who want to read them, I did not hide them from you, but published them and published my response to them
These were his remarks, devoid of any Qur'anic verse to contradict my book
(He cites the Qur'an and Sunnah about the science of the unseen and then proceeds in a gradual and systematic way to emphasise that man must think about his religion in a scientific and modern way, until he has managed to conceptualise the minor and major signs of the resurrection in a scientific and modern way, and tries to interpret these signs in a comical way that takes him out of the correct Islamic conceptualisation of them.
He does not limit himself to this, but in this book he denies a matter that is known from the religion of necessity in the matter of belief. He declares that Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) is the Seal of the Prophets, not the Seal of the Messengers, p. 33 ff. He believes that those who deny this are like the ignorant people who denied the prophethood of our master Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and that painful torment awaits those who believe that he is the Seal of the Messengers and cites verses from Surah al-Dukhan from verse 1 to verse 15 as evidence for this. The whole book is dominated by this malicious idea, and he continues to affirm it from the beginning to the end of the book in an explicit manner, believing that he is the author of a new invitation, and that everyone must believe in it, which denies something that is known from the religion of necessity, namely that Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the seal of the prophets and messengers).
This is the opinion of Al-Azhar and you have my entire book, so whoever wants to be convinced of Al-Azhar's opinion, let him be convinced and whoever wants to be convinced of my opinion, let him be convinced.
In the end, my opinion does not contradict the Qur'an and Sunnah, so whoever wants to argue with me, let him come up with a verse or an honourable hadith that denies what I came up with in my book, otherwise he should not trouble himself with me, as I presented my opinion and supported it with the Qur'an and Sunnah, and whoever wants to come up with an opinion that contradicts my opinion, let him come like me with an opinion supported by the Qur'an and Sunnah.
EN 
AR 
FR 
ES 
PT 
DE 
IT 
PL 
SV 
NB 
FI 
NL 
DA 
CS 
SK 
ET 
LV 
LT 
RU 
BE 
UK 
HU 
BG 
RO 
SR 
HR 
BS 
SQ 
EL 
TR 
HE 
ZH 
JA 
KO 
ID 
MS 
VI 
TL 
TH 
MY 
KM 
HI 
UR 
BN 
FA 
PS 
KK 
UZ 
HY 
KA 
TA 
NE 
SI 
SW 
AM