There are people who drain my effort in talking to them
The last post I published today was a person who spent three hours debating with me about whether the Messenger mentioned in Surat Ad-Dukhan is the Mahdi or another Messenger? And was the pledge of allegiance before or after Ad-Dukhan?
Three hours of discussion and he assured me that he had read the entire book, and I believe that he was convinced by the first two chapters in the book and that he was convinced that our master Muhammad was not the Seal of the Messengers, and that there were a few points left in the middle of the book that he wanted to understand.
And after three hours of discussion, I was surprised that he was not convinced by the first two chapters of the book, which are the basis of the book, and that he had exhausted my time, effort, and nerves arguing with him about secondary issues in the middle of the book.
Frankly, it taught me a lesson I will never forget and made me decide that I will not discuss minor matters in the middle of the book with anyone unless they are convinced by the first two chapters in the book.
How can I convince him that the Mahdi is a messenger, when he is still fully convinced that our master Muhammad is the Seal of the Messengers?
How do I convince him of minor issues in the middle of the book when he is not convinced of the main points of the book? How can I argue about whether the smoke came before or after the pledge of allegiance with someone who is not convinced that the Mahdi is a messenger?
Three hours taught me that I will not enter into a discussion with anyone else unless they have read the entire book and are convinced by the first two chapters of the book. Otherwise, anyone who is not convinced, the evidence I presented in my book from the Quran and Sunnah. I have no other evidence. Whoever wants to be convinced by my opinion can discuss with me any part of the book that is unclear to him. Whoever does not want to be convinced by the basis of the book, I have no authority over him until I convince him with other evidence. My question at the beginning of any dialogue with anyone who discusses the book with me after reading it all will be, “Are you convinced by the first two chapters of the book or not?” So that I can shorten the discussion period and know exactly what he wants.
Can you imagine three hours of dialogue in the comments and typing on the keyboard?
Frankly, I am very tired and I do not know exactly what people like Dolm want to lead me to.