23 March 2020
Today, Monday 23 March 2020, I went to the Islamic Research Council after two months of reviewing my book Waiting Letters. I was received by an employee of the Islamic Research Council, who did not read my book at all, and informed me that Al-Azhar has not approved my book Waiting Letters by a final decision that cannot be discussed and asked me to sign a pledge not to print the book from today, 23 March 2020, and to be satisfied with what was previously printed and distributed from the book, and I agreed to this decision, as I was expecting it.
But what I didn't expect was not discussing the book with me and not responding to the book with evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah in only half a page, as opposed to a book full of evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah in 400 pages
This is in addition to the fact that I did not consider in my book those who say that the Prophet Muhammad is the Seal of Messengers to be ignorant in any part of my book, as mentioned in the second reason for the prohibition
However, despite the fact that my book was banned from printing without responding to what came in the book from the Qur'an and Sunnah and without discussing with me in a manner similar to the aphorism "Do not discuss and do not argue, my brother", I accept Al-Azhar's decision to stop printing my book without responding to what came in my book with argument, but with this response I have increased my certainty that I am on the right, thank God, and it remains, God willing, that the truth will appear soon, either in my life or after my death, and God willing I will soon publish the response to what came in the reasons Al-Azhar banned my book The Awaited Letters ...
I, praise be to God, satisfied my conscience and informed you of the knowledge I reached with the argument from the Qur'an and the Sunnah, and let the guilt of those who prevented this knowledge from reaching the Muslims and who will lie to the next Prophet be on the shoulders of those who prevented my book The Awaited Messages.
It is up to you to compare my book with the reasons why my book was banned
Waiting Messages, which you will find in the excerpts I published earlier from the book Waiting Messages.
Update
A sentence denying something that is known from the religion of necessity
Mentioned in any verse in the Qur'an or in any hadith
Is this sentence a convincing response to the Qur'anic verses and hadiths in my book that prove that messengers exist in every time and place and that messengers have not and will not end?
I know that I disagree with the consensus of scholars and I was waiting for a response from the Qur'an and Sunnah, and it is not logical that the response should be that I deny something that is known from the religion of necessity, which no one can discuss or argue about.
I provided evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah in my book, so the response to my book should be based on the Qur'an and Sunnah and not on a sentence denying something that is known from the religion of necessity.
Where is the logic and argument in this sentence?
You have little knowledge of science.
What we have reached in science is not the end that we should not go beyond as long as we do not come up with anything that contradicts the Qur'an and Sunnah.
But what I didn't expect was not discussing the book with me and not responding to the book with evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah in only half a page, as opposed to a book full of evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah in 400 pages
This is in addition to the fact that I did not consider in my book those who say that the Prophet Muhammad is the Seal of Messengers to be ignorant in any part of my book, as mentioned in the second reason for the prohibition
However, despite the fact that my book was banned from printing without responding to what came in the book from the Qur'an and Sunnah and without discussing with me in a manner similar to the aphorism "Do not discuss and do not argue, my brother", I accept Al-Azhar's decision to stop printing my book without responding to what came in my book with argument, but with this response I have increased my certainty that I am on the right, thank God, and it remains, God willing, that the truth will appear soon, either in my life or after my death, and God willing I will soon publish the response to what came in the reasons Al-Azhar banned my book The Awaited Letters ...
I, praise be to God, satisfied my conscience and informed you of the knowledge I reached with the argument from the Qur'an and the Sunnah, and let the guilt of those who prevented this knowledge from reaching the Muslims and who will lie to the next Prophet be on the shoulders of those who prevented my book The Awaited Messages.
It is up to you to compare my book with the reasons why my book was banned
Waiting Messages, which you will find in the excerpts I published earlier from the book Waiting Messages.
Update
A sentence denying something that is known from the religion of necessity
Mentioned in any verse in the Qur'an or in any hadith
Is this sentence a convincing response to the Qur'anic verses and hadiths in my book that prove that messengers exist in every time and place and that messengers have not and will not end?
I know that I disagree with the consensus of scholars and I was waiting for a response from the Qur'an and Sunnah, and it is not logical that the response should be that I deny something that is known from the religion of necessity, which no one can discuss or argue about.
I provided evidence from the Qur'an and Sunnah in my book, so the response to my book should be based on the Qur'an and Sunnah and not on a sentence denying something that is known from the religion of necessity.
Where is the logic and argument in this sentence?
You have little knowledge of science.
What we have reached in science is not the end that we should not go beyond as long as we do not come up with anything that contradicts the Qur'an and Sunnah.