Here are the judgements of the FB debates I face to discuss people who criticise my book The Awaited Messages.

2 March 2020
Here are the judgements of the FB debates I face to discuss people who criticise my book The Awaited Messages.

My interlocutor is usually anonymous and has a pseudonym on Facebook
Often does not post his/her own photo
He probably hasn't read the excerpts I've excerpted from my book and doesn't want to read my book at all, so he's usually unwilling to change his mind.
He starts his dialogue with me with respect so that he can draw me into his discussion.
He asks me not to refer to my book and asks me to discuss point by point without referring to my book, as if he wants me to give him other evidence than what is in my book, which he did not respond to.
According to the accepted rules of Facebook debates, the person who debates me cannot retract his opinion after I present him with all the arguments and proofs, so he resorts to either mocking me, insulting me, accusing me of disbelief, madness, etc. or deleting some of my comments, deleting the conversation or deleting the post altogether after he has exhausted my time and effort with him.
These are the Facebook debate judgements I struggle with every day
Facebook debates have rules that must be followed 
en_GBEN